By the way
1991, two bullet holes at face level through the glass front across from the Museum in Frankfurt.
It is a well-known fact that shots are fired in Frankfurt now and again of which the majority occurs in the train station area. Museums and other educational institutes were not targets so far. At least not until September 1991. In the early morning hours of September 12, 1999 police forces hermetically sealed off the passage between Nikolai Church and Historical Museum, a uniformed sharp shooter shouldered, aimed and fired two shots. Since then, two bullet holes are located at an exactly calculated distance from each other at face height. If one stands behind one of the window panes (area is not open to the public) one can well imagine for a few moments that the horizontal line of the shots might easily have run right through his own forehead before hitting the back wall at a right angle. A thought which momentarily generates a very extensive feeling of existence. Ballistic curves like that continuously draw short-lived curves and lines through empty space around the globe and often meet moving targets in their course. Ottmar Hörl wrote the script for this event, a sculpture and photography artist who - personally - is a person of disarming anti-militancy, his artistic concepts, however, recurrently contain violent elements. The two shots fired in the dawn intentionally structured the room (if such thoughts may be permitted for a moment). Two parallel lines of highest energy aimed at a 90 degree angle at glass and wall - they were real and physically existent if for only for split seconds to then immediately become imaginary lines. That is to an extent the way of interpretation Hörl himself favors. There is another which places political imagery in the foreground rather than formal aspects - and it seems directly plausible. Two shots at face height fired at the forefront of a museum are as much a decisive as coquettish comment to the request - Art in Public - they are consent and denial at the same time. And they are last words (speechless but distinct) about politics which calculate present art primarily as a factor of benefit in passing for the image of the service provider's location to then turn around and decorate the places and parks of the cities almost without exception with mediocre but also material and cost intensive artistic products as you would decorate a parlor with all kinds of knick-knacks. But this type of art has been capable of winning a majority. Two shots at face height therefore definitely represent a cultural political situation. On a side note, they also were inexpensive as well as consuming very little material.
Manfred E. Schuchmann (1991)